Nevada’s Stimulus Projects
Stimulus Watch has built a website that details each state’s “stimulus” projects. Nevada’s totals $1.5-billion, not including the Peidtrain.
How State and Local Government Spends Your Money
This site would not be possible without:
Stimulus Watch has built a website that details each state’s “stimulus” projects. Nevada’s totals $1.5-billion, not including the Peidtrain.
I cannot more highly recommend this graphic, from the Washington Post.
(Peid is a contraction of Pelosi-Reid and rhymes with “speed”)
The stimulus package passed tonight apparently includes $8-billion for a Vegas-to-Riverside Peid Train.
It will have less capacity than Southwest Airlines, and will take longer. Hopefully, it will cost less to ride. Otherwise, we’ll have to outlaw Southwest Airlines.
Plus or minus, the Peid Train divides out to $4,000 per man, woman and child in Las Vegas. The burden will fall on our grandchildren, since this Congress and President lack the morality to actually fund their lardfest by collecting the money from the living. Or, perhaps, the feds will default on the debt.
When government takes money, it does so a little bit per taxpayer. When it spends money, it does so a lot per recipient. That’s why those who govern always find it easier to raise taxes than slow the rate of increase in government spending – there’s less complaining.
A rarity in the debate is an actual list of places to cut spending. Such a list was released this week over at the Nevada Policy Research Institute. Here it is.
Nevada’s State Archivist Guy Rocha made the front page of the newspaper with news of his retirement. He offered, in addition to his usual ability to fascinate with his command of Nevada history, some political views. For example:
“I find it disturbing this state that has essentially been my life is, in my opinion, on the brink of disaster. You can’t cut 34 percent or more without devastating state government”… Rocha fears legislators in the coming session will cut state spending so severely that it might take decades for his and other agencies to recover.
This is a little melodramatic. The latest estimates of Nevada’s tax revenue for the next two years is that state tax revenues will be about this same for the two years starting July 1, 2007 as it was for the two years starting July 1, 2005, and that it will be about the same for the two years starting July 1, 2009. Our flat revenue is much higher than revenue was for the two years starting July 1, 2003, and that number was swollen with the largest tax hikes in many decades passed by the 2003 Legislature. Later, Rocha notes he was a history major.
Rocha parts with this:
Rocha also criticized the state’s tax structure, saying it relies too much on tourist-generated revenues and leads to wild swings in the state’s financial health.
“We need a 21st-century Nevada, and it can’t rely on tourism to keep driving the engine,” Rocha said. “Tourism will no longer be able to sustain state government unless people are satisfied with a government so small it can’t do very much at all.”
All the available evidence indicates that our ability to export taxes to visitors has led to greater tax structure stability for Nevada, rather than wild swings. The current economic downturn (the private sector is down and losing jobs while the public sector is flat and not losing jobs) started with the “locals” economy of residential construction, and for many months tourism continued to do well, and the 2001 downturn was much less severe in Nevada than most states due to how quickly tourism rebounded.
Although Henderson elected officials complained of cutting budgets just last week, this week they were flush enough to expand their already-expansive legislative lobbying effort by a quarter-million dollars.
Local governments in Nevada spend lavishly to lobby the legislature.